On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 14:21 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 12:11:01 -0700, > Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >I have it on my release checklist to ensure a matching spin-kickstarts > >is *built*, but I've never considered it required to go into the frozen > >package set at the point of building the RCs. AFAIK it's always been OK > >to get it done once we declare an RC as gold, so we know what > >spin-kickstarts state to build exactly. > > In the past some people have been more concerned about this. I think the > issue might have been that the src rpms for updates might go away when > the update goes away. So that if spin-kickstarts got updated a second > time after the release, the source used to build the release might not > be available. (At least easily. I think it wouldn't be too much work > to go back and figure it out if someone really wanted the exact source > used for a release.) I did not suggest that we ship the spin-kickstarts package as an update: it can be pushed stable after the RC compose, and that's what we've done before. The point is that it doesn't actually go onto the _release images_ themselves. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
