Re: /usr/lib64/udev/rules.d/ actually processed?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am 24.06.2013 20:57, schrieb Bill Nottingham:
> Florian Weimer (fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
>> Does udev/systemd actually process files in rhis directory?  I found
>> a couple of files in that directory, from the isdn4k-utils package
>> and from libwacom-0.6.1-1.fc17.x86_64.  The lib64 directory isn't
>> mentioned in udev(7), and I can't find it in the
>> /usr/lib/systemd/systemd-udevd binary.
> 
> No

what means "No" in this context?

[] /usr/lib64/udev/rules.d/ is ignored because "lib64" is wrong
[] /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/ is also ignored
[] /etc/udev/rules.d/ which is used like below will also not work in F18+

however, only "No" is not a very good response

[root@proxy:~]$ cat /etc/udev/rules.d/50-ats.rules
# /etc/udev/rules.d/50-ats.rules
# Apache Traffic Server owns disk for RAW access
KERNEL=="sdc", OWNER="ats"

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux