On Sun, 2013-06-23 at 19:22 +0200, drago01 wrote: > On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, 2013-06-23 at 09:44 +0200, drago01 wrote: > > > >> 2) We don't have to set a limit at all. Just include the stuff we want > >> to include (and try to optimize that to be as small as possible). > > > > Let's be realistic: 'trying to optimize that to be as small as possible' > > only happens when we have a limit and start hitting it. Was anyone > > checking and splitting out dependencies, tweaking the package set, and > > looking for unnecessary data to cut out *before* we were filing bugs on > > the size? Nope, no-one was. > > > > I'm not saying there must be a limit, but I know what's going to happen > > if there isn't one, don't kid yourself: limitless sprawl, and no-one's > > going to bother about size reductions. > > See my reply to Matthew. I meant in the desktop image specifically, not in the distro in general. There are people who care strongly about the core/minimal size and work to keep it down, but the live spins generally just keep growing until they hit a limit, whereupon we start filing bugs and people start caring. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
