On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 07:24:15AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> > Just because someone decided "there has to be a size limit and if we >> > don't meet that target we block the release" does >> > not mean that this is the right thing to do (note: it isn't). A limit >> > only makes sense if you target a CD. >> As noted in my previous message, we are in fact still targeting optical >> media with the live images: the multi-live DVD image. > > Small size is also desirable for cloud images -- it makes them easier to > manipulateand faster to deploy. I know that's not the _current_ discussion, > but I hope people remember that if optical media go away (or increase 10x in > capacity, or whatever), a small core still has practical advantages. Two things: 1) no one really uses the desktop image as a basis for cloud 2) having no limit does not mean people will stop caring about size ... as this example shows. If someone cares he/she can work on reducing size. But we do not need to enforce it using arbitrary limits. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
