Once upon a time, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> said: > Mind if I ask why you think this way about NetworkManager? The NM > currently shipping in Fedora 19 has full support for managing static > NICs, as well as bonding, bridging and VLAN support for enterprise > use-cases. I think most "traditional" system admins see a running NM daemon as an additional point of failure in a static network. If my server's network setup is static, I don't want a daemon running attempting to "manage" it. If it has a bug, gets misconfigured, etc., it might do something to screw up an otherwise working setup. I understand that some servers/setups may be able to take advantage of NM functionality, but assuming that all servers _need_ NM is too much. This is all IMHO of course. -- Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
