Re: bugzilla.redhat.com vs upstream bug trackers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 17:29:55 +0200
Michael Scherer <misc@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Le lundi 17 juin 2013 à 10:52 +0200, Florian Weimer a écrit :
> > I'm wondering what the current guidelines for filing bugs on 
> > bugzilla.redhat.com are. 
> > <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bugs_and_feature_requests> welcomes 
> > filing enhancement requests, but some package maintainers disagree
> > and require filing bugs upstream.
> > 
> > I would like to avoid creating accounts in gazillion upstream bug 
> > trackers, 
> 
> If only more bug trackers would accept openid, this would make the
> issue less problematic for all.
> 
> There is a plugin for that : 
> https://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla:OpenID_Auth_Plugin
> 
> So is there any reason to not offer it, or I can start filling bug to
> request it ?

In bugzilla.redhat.com? Feel free to request it, but I don't think it
will be much of a priority. ;( 

Upstream bugzilla has moved to 'persona' instead of openid, and this
openid plugin is pretty dead/unmaintained sadly. 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux