Re: bugzilla.redhat.com vs upstream bug trackers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm wondering what the current guidelines for filing bugs on
> bugzilla.redhat.com are.
> <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bugs_and_feature_requests> welcomes filing
> enhancement requests, but some package maintainers disagree and require
> filing bugs upstream.

The only way I can read
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintainer_responsibilities#Deal_with_reported_bugs_in_a_timely_manner
is that bugzilla.redhat.com should be used and not ignored.  OTOH
that's the written policy, not the actual state, which is that some
package maintainers disagree - usually, for what is, from an
individual point of view, a good reason.

In general I'd say that packages where the maintainer that don't have
the time, interest or willingness to handle bugzilla.redhat.com
reports, should get comaintainers if at all possible.
    Mirek
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux