Re: status of ghostscript

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le mardi 19 octobre 2004 Ã 20:20 +0100, Tim Waugh a Ãcrit :

> The other way of looking at it is that ESP would do the work and we
> wouldn't have to. :-)
> 
> Just want to figure out which is more appropriate for Fedora Core.

I don't know the ESP people, but from my POW their fork could easily
turn into something like the ximian oo.o fork (ie a staging area where
distros pool patches instead of reinventing the wheel in their little
linux corner and massively duplicating efforts).

Of course I may be horribly wrong;)

Cheers,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux