Re: RPM artifacts related to ghost files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/05/2013 09:59 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 06/05/2013 05:30 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:

Thanks for noticing and reporting!

Thanks for caring.

I've got another one: In abrt-2.1.4-1.fc17.i686, the ghost files
/var/run/abrt/abrt.socket and /var/run/abrt/abrtd.pid both have inode 0
and link count 2.  But they can't be hard-linked because one has mode
666, and the other mode 644.  This throws my hard link detection logic
off course.  (I will disable it for zero inodes.)


Right, that's an anomaly specific to rpm < 4.10 with %ghosts which dont exist in the buildroot, the nlink counting probably just merrily figures they're hardlinks because device and inode match (as they are zero). With rpm >= 4.10 ghosts get a "virtual" inode like everything else whether they exist or not (this is probably contrary to what I said yesterday on irc).

Another anomaly/curiosity is that hardlinked ghosts existing on buildroot still get their nlink count as if they were hardlinked, but this hardly makes sense.

What would actually make sense with %ghosts is ... a good question, common sense doesn't necessarily apply with the paranormal :) Always zeroing out inode and device + taking this into account elsewhere in nlink counting is one possibility.

	- Panu -

--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux