Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'm sure we could ask the FPC to add this to guidelines. > > I've filed such a ticket, please feel free to add comments: > > > > https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/295 > > It's reasonable, but is missing an important feature. "All source > materials for the RPM must also be contained in the new SRPM, > preferably as source material." This creates a preference for source > rather than .jar, .war, or .gem files, but I think that's really > desirable. The requirement to build from source is already explicit: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#No_inclusion_of_pre-built_binaries_or_libraries Björn Persson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
