On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, 25 May 2013 11:15:22 -0400 > Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> [ Sorry for the late reply, I've been at a family funeral this week. ] > > :( > >> That's very specific to the Fedora build environment. Difficult to >> replicate in the field without a huge local build structure! And >> enforced by a specific build environment is nowhere near the same >> thing as "mandated by published policy" to help SRPM builders know how >> they should plan their work. > > ...snip... > > I'm sure we could ask the FPC to add this to guidelines. > I've filed such a ticket, please feel free to add comments: > > https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/295 > > kevin It's reasonable, but is missing an important feature. "All source materials for the RPM must also be contained in the new SRPM, preferably as source material." This creates a preference for source rather than .jar, .war, or .gem files, but I think that's really desirable. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
