Hi,
--
Best regards,
Michal
http://eventhorizon.pl/
https://getactive.pl/
2013/5/18 Tomasz Torcz <tomek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 06:18:41AM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:That's some strange interpretation. I completly don't agree with that.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962081
>
> I have a request to change the name of selinux-policy-devel to
> selinux-policy-devel-support, since
>
> "everywhere else in the distro -devel means just header files in c and not any
> other development tools and we have several scripts that assume that's the case."
That seems like a perfect description for what -devel is. For normal usage
> selinux-policy-devel contains interface files and tools required to build
> selinux-policy. It also currently contains the man pages, which I can move to
> the base package.
selinux-policy is required. For building and modification – -devel package. Seems
completely intuitive for me.
Agree.
I wonder if "-devel means just header files in c" applies to c++ headers as well?
I wonder if "-devel means just header files in c" applies to c++ headers as well?
About assumptions: does ‘rpmlint selinux-policy.spec‘ complains?
--
Tomasz Torcz 72->| 80->|
xmpp: zdzichubg@xxxxxxxxx 72->| 80->|
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
--
Best regards,
Michal
http://eventhorizon.pl/
https://getactive.pl/
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
