Re: Does -devel package name only indicate "C" development packages?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 06:18:41AM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962081
> 
> I have a request to change the name of selinux-policy-devel to
> selinux-policy-devel-support, since
> 
> "everywhere else in the distro -devel means just header files in c and not any
> other development tools and we have several scripts that assume that's the case."
 
  That's some strange interpretation. I completly don't agree with that.

> selinux-policy-devel contains interface files and tools required to build
> selinux-policy.  It also currently contains the man pages, which I can move to
> the base package.

  That seems like a perfect description for what -devel is.  For normal usage
selinux-policy is required.  For building and modification – -devel package. Seems
completely intuitive for me.

  About assumptions: does ‘rpmlint selinux-policy.spec‘ complains?

-- 
Tomasz Torcz                                                       72->|   80->|
xmpp: zdzichubg@xxxxxxxxx                                          72->|   80->|

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux