On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 5:25 AM, Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Dne 14.5.2013 20:46, Josh Boyer napsal(a): >>> >>> Heck the community did not have the faintest idea which tickets they even >>> worked ( or did any work at all ) on until I literally request they >>> adopted >>> the fesco model so we atleast could get a faint idea what was going to be >>> discussed on those meeting... >> >> Sounds like working with them has paid off nicely. Maybe you should >> do more of that. >> >>> Let's just continue to cross finger hope that those that have been chosen >>> <-- yeah that's right not elected but chosen bother to show up to do >>> their >>> due diligence and reach a quorum. >> >> The elections are open, and the voting is not rigged. You can be >> displeased all you like about who gets elected and what they choose >> (or not choose) to look at, but that doesn't make those committees a >> farce. > > > This complaint was about FPC and you are unfortunately wrong about that: > > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2013-April/009068.html > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-May/001147.html > > There is nothing like open election to FPC. Ah. I thought he was referring to FESCo and being hyperbolic. josh -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
