On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 12:03:39AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Anaconda has a pretty special place in this project. It is the > uber-administrator of every new Fedora install. We would do better > as a community to hash out major changes before they're made, and > try to reach some agreement before we implement them. I've been reading loads and loads of blogs about the Anaconda redesign. That was a pretty major change. Something like showing a password is terribly minor change when developing. There was a pretty huge outcry about the Anaconda redesign, despite all the blogs. Now there is some small change, and there is a call that "major changes need to be hashed out". Seems like nothing they'd do would ever be good enough. Getting consensus before most commits sounds like a good way to scare away developers. -- Regards, Olav -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
