On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 11:43 -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 05/06/2013 10:48 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > > > > > On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 6:31 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > On 05/04/2013 12:24 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > On the other hand, if it's the right thing to do, > > then it needs to be done for GUI password change > > dialogs and the passwd command should be updated as > > well, for consistency, no? > > > > > > On a related note, Anaconda, GNOME, KDE etc seems to be > > relying on different rules about what an acceptable password > > is. We really need to settle on one library and provide a > > consistent way to tweak it. > > "Everything" (certainly Anaconda and GNOME, not sure about KDE) is > > supposed to use libpwquality. Is that not so? > > > > They are definitely not enforcing the same rules. One obvious area of inconsistency is that some of the tools _warn_ on weak passwords, and some _block_ on weak passwords. We should standardize on one or the other of those. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
