On Qui, 2013-05-02 at 15:22 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 15:01 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Sáb, 2013-04-27 at 15:59 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > this one is no longer relevant and if there would be a karma-option > > > in koji i would have given as i rolled out 3.8.8-102.fc17.x86_64 > > > in production > > > > But 3.8.8-102.fc17.x86_64 is not pushed to updates-testing . > > Meanwhile kernel-3.8.8-100.fc17 has reached the stable karma threshold > > and will be pushed to the stable updates repository . > > I think the kernel team has intentionally stopped pushing things to > -testing so quickly for F(N-1) because the karma doesn't come in fast > enough; if they keep pushing builds to updates-testing as they get done, > then they *never* get enough karma to go stable before they get > obsoleted by the next one. So they're letting kernels sit in > updates-testing for longer in the hopes they'll at least get something > pushed stable. > I try to do f-e-k for F(N-1) regularly but I'm not doing a great job of > it lately :( We definitely need more people to do it. Thinking about it, > the problem may be that people running F(N-1) are typically more > 'conservative' users who don't want to enable updates-testing. That's > certainly the case for me; my real F(N-1) systems are my servers, and I > don't want to run updates-testing on those, obviously. I have to use a > VM to do karma runs. OK, also is not normal the number of updates in upstream . Anyway could someone give karma for a bunch of security updates ? https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-6999/kernel-3.8.11-100.fc17 Please -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
