Re: Embedded SIG

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Dan Mashal <dan.mashal@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 5:01 AM, Markus Mayer <lotharlutz@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have started developing for embedded devices (aka microcontrollers) lately
>> (mainly ARM cortex-M3 devices). Although fedora provides some of the needed
>> tools, there are still some bits missing to provide a good out-of-the-box
>> experience.
>>
>> So I have decide to ask if there are others like me, and if there are
>> willing to form a SIG (special interest group) to enhance embedded
>> developing with fedora.
>>
>> I think the main things to discuss within the sig are:
>> - Finding out what fedora is missing to provide a good develepmont
>> experience
>> - Packaging (Cross-compilers, cross-debugers, ...)
>>
>> So if you are interested in helping to move thinks further or if you have
>> any interesting/help-full information, I would highly appreciate your help.
>>
>>
>> regards
>>
>> Markus
>> --
>> devel mailing list
>> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
> How does this differ from the already existing ARM sig?

Completely unrelated.

Peter
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux