On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:51:05PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On 19/04/13 10:18 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> >> >Last time, we've had this kind of discussions, people were claiming they >> >were querying changelogs from _binary_ rpms and from installed rpms (rpm >> >-q --changelog) >> >> I do that. All the time. Sometimes going back a long, long time. >> >> I could certainly work around the limitation if the binary RPM >> changelogs were cut off, but it would require me to change, if anyone >> cares. > > Is there a cutoff date that would cover maybe 90% of your use cases? I > think that one year would be too short for my use cases as well. But there > are packages in the distro with changelogs going back to the RHL/fedora.us > days and I personally never go back even half that far. If we chose a date > two years or three years or even four years in the past, it might be a > reasonable compromise for everyone. I think about 18 months is useful, they do take up a surprisingly large amount of space if you've got a small device like a XO-1. Peter -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
