On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:51:05PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On 19/04/13 10:18 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > >Last time, we've had this kind of discussions, people were claiming they > >were querying changelogs from _binary_ rpms and from installed rpms (rpm > >-q --changelog) > > I do that. All the time. Sometimes going back a long, long time. > > I could certainly work around the limitation if the binary RPM > changelogs were cut off, but it would require me to change, if anyone > cares. Is there a cutoff date that would cover maybe 90% of your use cases? I think that one year would be too short for my use cases as well. But there are packages in the distro with changelogs going back to the RHL/fedora.us days and I personally never go back even half that far. If we chose a date two years or three years or even four years in the past, it might be a reasonable compromise for everyone. -Toshio
Attachment:
pgpvRn8p4KYdC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
