-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/04/2013 06:14 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 16:54:03 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> >>> Note that we're frozen for Alpha, so this won't go in stable >>> until after Alpha release unless there's a legitimate reason to >>> make it a freeze exception issue - >>> https://fedoraproject.org/** >>> wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_**bug_process<https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process>. >>> >> >> >>> Nah... I've waited this long. At least a fix is coming. > > It would have been possible for you to work around the missing > #include by adding it to the source code you wanted to build. Never > has there been a requirement to "wait for alsa-lib". > Sure, but my interpretation of the problem is that this was causing FTBFS on any package in F19 that was trying to BuildRequires: alsa-lib-devel because of changes made in GCC. It seems like the correct behavior for alsa-lib to restore the existing functionality than to force all downstreams to include a hack around the problem. And it was nice and easy. But yes, I certainly follow your point about his particular package having the *option* of hacking around it if there was an urgent need. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlFdcV8ACgkQeiVVYja6o6PBvACbBZaRDFkyHnXWm7TGNGOYmxEF 6KEAoIWTcp5SFbzyfT8ILhCKTFPWwtxZ =sogc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
