Re: package, package2, package3 naming-with-version exploit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dne 29.3.2013 15:51, Jan Zelený napsal(a):
On 29. 3. 2013 at 14:38:49, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 29.3.2013 13:28, Jan Zelený napsal(a):
But the point I was making is that the technical solution of multiversion
packaging has a potential to bring such a mess in spec files that they
become unmaintanable and therefore the solution would be practically
useless.
Any example here? Could you show us some example .spec files, to
illustrate your point, please?
No need to go far for that. I think that the solution proposed in the very
first email of this thread is the best illustration you can have at this moment
and I also think Florian described well what are the issues it brings for
maintainers.

Thanks
Jan

I could live with that one line, if it will remove the mangled package name. So please, show me example to let me understand your point.


Vít
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux