Re: package, package2, package3 naming-with-version exploit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 29. 3. 2013 at 14:38:49, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 29.3.2013 13:28, Jan Zelený napsal(a):
> > But the point I was making is that the technical solution of multiversion
> > packaging has a potential to bring such a mess in spec files that they
> > become unmaintanable and therefore the solution would be practically
> > useless.
> Any example here? Could you show us some example .spec files, to
> illustrate your point, please?

No need to go far for that. I think that the solution proposed in the very 
first email of this thread is the best illustration you can have at this moment 
and I also think Florian described well what are the issues it brings for 
maintainers.

Thanks
Jan
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux