Le jeudi 28 mars 2013 à 17:45 +0100, Vít Ondruch a écrit : > If this problem was put first time on the table in 2002, > then there already passed 10 years of excuses. Or that in 10 years, we didn't found a proper solution that was sustainable. > It is interesting to see > that our competition can do much more with our technology then we do. Depend on what you define as "competition" and "our technology". While this could be anything, I will assume that you are speaking of debian, cause that's the only one that make sense to me. If I am not wrong, on debian, you can have 1 single source package that by magic could generate multiple packages for multiple runtimes ( for example, for python ). The issue of having multiple stack remain ( ie, 2 stack just mean twice the QA, twice more bugs for that packager ), but that greatly reduce the burden, that's right. Now, I do not know ho we could do exept by redoing large part of specfile, or by having some macro that generate half of the spec automatically. This could be done ( like that's done for debuginfo ), and I have seen creative way to mass generate packages, so that exist in the wild. But I am not sure if you are talking of that. -- Michael Scherer -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
