On 14/03/13 02:49 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 14/03/2013 10:30, Adam Williamson a écrit :
On 14/03/13 01:18 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 13/03/2013 23:49, Orion Poplawski a écrit :
In any case, this is going to be pretty disruptive. I think we need to
do some hard thinking about whether we want to go with this naming
scheme or not. If we do, I think we need to do IM development in a side
tag to work out all the kinks.
If consumer correctly use pkg-config information, there should not have
any problem...
Would that be the pkgconfig file whose name changed as part of this
change? :)
No, as both names are provided.
%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/MagickCore.pc
++%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/MagickCore-6.Q16.pc
%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/ImageMagick.pc
++%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/ImageMagick-6.Q16.pc
%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/MagickWand.pc
++%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/MagickWand-6.Q16.pc
And the <foo>-config commands are unchanged.
%{_bindir}/Magick-config
%{_bindir}/MagickWand-config
%{_bindir}/Wand-config
$ pkg-config MagickWand --cflags --libs
-fopenmp -DMAGICKCORE_HDRI_ENABLE=0 -DMAGICKCORE_QUANTUM_DEPTH=16
-I/usr/include/ImageMagick-6 -lMagickWand-6.Q16 -lm
-lMagickCore-6.Q16
Ah, I missed that it was just an addition.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
