On 03/13/2013 04:41 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/13/2013 10:03 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
Good day.
By request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849065 I plan split off
ImageMagick-libs sub-package and update ImageMagick to last 6.8.3-9 version.
There many changes including so-name bump and version scheme change from
upstream:
libMagickCore.so.5 became libMagickCore-6.Q16.so
I plan push it in rawhide 14-17 March if no one will argue.
Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5117303
Also changed some directories. Major differences in layout:
%files devel
--%{_libdir}/libMagickCore.so
--%{_libdir}/libMagickWand.so
++%{_libdir}/libMagickCore-6.Q16.so
++%{_libdir}/libMagickWand-6.Q16.so
%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/MagickCore.pc
++%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/MagickCore-6.Q16.pc
%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/ImageMagick.pc
++%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/ImageMagick-6.Q16.pc
%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/MagickWand.pc
++%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/MagickWand-6.Q16.pc
%files c++-devel
--%{_libdir}/libMagick++.so
++%{_libdir}/libMagick++-6.Q16.so
This renaming is going to break a *lot* of things (including cmake finding
ImageMagick). Why was it done?
There is some discussion here:
http://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=22932&sid=94067bc9bfe15d538f61865a7346a497
In any case, this is going to be pretty disruptive. I think we need to do
some hard thinking about whether we want to go with this naming scheme or not.
If we do, I think we need to do IM development in a side tag to work out all
the kinks.
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA, Boulder Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane orion@xxxxxxxx
Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
