Re: Unhelpful update descriptions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 18:20 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> 
> The discussion seems to have branched out a bit, but going back to 
> Michael's original mail, he's clearly onto something. It should not be 
> too hard for Bodhi to reject:
> 
> * Entirely empty update descriptions
> * An update description which is simply the placeholder text
> 
> and I can't see any reason why we shouldn't just do that. Luke, could we 
> make it so?
> -- 
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
> http://www.happyassassin.net
This sounds good. It seems like there's some contention as to the proper
level of detail in update descriptions, and that's fine, but I think we
all agree that these two cases are not acceptable. Thanks!

Michael Catanzaro

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux