-Dan
--
Registered Linux User #231597
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Fantastic.I've seen a lot of cases in the AsciiDoc discussions (social media, mailinglist, etc) of one person advising another to avoid the package in Fedora because it's too old, I'd say the update in F18 is the way to go.-DanOn Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
--I've taken over maintainership of AsciiDoc and prepared an update in rawhide to
8.6.8. I'm bcc-ing maintainers in case they don't read devel. I will tag the
build on Monday barring any major issues/complaints. For now you can play with
it by downloading from koji[1]. I am considering update in F18 as well if there
won't be major issues. I believe users would appreciate the update and in worst
case packagers could just disable asciidoc generation for single release. Any
problems with that, let me know.
Changes between versions are substantial so it's possible some packages will
FTBFS. I've also split 3 additional subpackages:
-doc: documentation, examples etc
-music: support for music notation (pulls in lilypond)
-latex: support for latex generation (pulls in dblatex)
If your package used latex/music processing you should probably update your
BuildRequires.
[1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=400964
--
Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky@xxxxxxxxxx>
Software Engineer - Developer Experience
PGP: 7B087241
Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
--Dan AllenPrincipal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597
Dan Allen
Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in ActionRegistered Linux User #231597
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
