Am 12.03.2013 09:55, schrieb drago01: > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:22 PM, seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:18:33 -0500 >> Michael Cronenworth <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> On 03/11/2013 04:13 PM, seth vidal wrote: >>>> I want to encourage kids, teenagers, etc to explore the OS. We need >>>> them to be involved in CREATING and LEARNING. So I don't want to >>>> scare any of them off. >>> >>> My OLPC does not present any boot menu or prompt. >> >> That's not an argument for why we should not present one. It is an >> argument for why they should be. > > Sorry but that's nonsense. Pretty much all other operating systems do > not display the boot loader by default and you see this as a reason > for showing it? > What kind of weird logic is that? Or do you really think we can have > "we do show a screen that you won't care about most of the time on > every boot" as a selling point for fedora? who cares about OTHER operating systems? if i would want their behavior i would install them are you guys booting the whole day your machines that save 2 seconds is woth any discussion?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
