On Qui, 2013-02-28 at 14:58 +0100, Rave it wrote: > > At today's FESCo meeting there were two tickets which had the end > > result of needing to have new maintainers and comaintainers for some > > packages: > > > > == https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1028 == > > > > tor package was reassigned to a new maintainer. Former maintainer > > dropped ownership of his other packages. Those are now orphaned and > > in need of a new owner. Note to potential new maintainers: although > > not mandatory, you may want to open an optional re-review request as > > the spec files for some of these may be very out of sync with the > > current Fedora Packaging Guidelines > > > > * clamav > I've added me as comaintainer to clamav and i'm willing to take > ownership if it is orphoned. > Shure, i will do a new review request because i want to reorganized the > package like it is for epel. > Fedora's version is total user unfriendly, ie. needed to copy > configuration files by hand and no default daemon configuration. > I used the epel version for a long time for myself, because you need > only installation and enable the the daemon, that's all. Hi, I also use clamav as daemon and I use fedora package, recently I upgrade the box, that use clamav, to Fedora 17. I had to do a new clamd.service based on what exist, so here it is /usr/lib/systemd/system/clamd.service : [Unit] Description = clamav server (clamd) daemon After = syslog.target nss-lookup.target network.target Before= spamassassin.service [Service] Type = simple ExecStart = /usr/sbin/clamd -c /etc/clamd.conf --nofork=yes Restart = on-failure PrivateTmp = true [Install] WantedBy=multi-user.target Cheers, -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
