> At today's FESCo meeting there were two tickets which had the end > result of needing to have new maintainers and comaintainers for some > packages: > > == https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1028 == > > tor package was reassigned to a new maintainer. Former maintainer > dropped ownership of his other packages. Those are now orphaned and > in need of a new owner. Note to potential new maintainers: although > not mandatory, you may want to open an optional re-review request as > the spec files for some of these may be very out of sync with the > current Fedora Packaging Guidelines > > * clamav I've added me as comaintainer to clamav and i'm willing to take ownership if it is orphoned. Shure, i will do a new review request because i want to reorganized the package like it is for epel. Fedora's version is total user unfriendly, ie. needed to copy configuration files by hand and no default daemon configuration. I used the epel version for a long time for myself, because you need only installation and enable the the daemon, that's all. Wolfgang -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
