Am Montag, den 18.02.2013, 23:34 +0000 schrieb John5342: > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Christoph Wickert > <christoph.wickert@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Despite of the question whether it's right or wrong it's a manual > > process and we cannot rely it really happens. On the other hand changing > > the script to not close any bugs which are ON_QA is easy. > > > > So what is so bad about ignoring bugs MODIFIED and/or ON_QA bugs? > > This is a corner case perhaps, but those bugs still need closing at > some point. If an updates-testing package gets un-pushed or never gets > sent to stable the bug will never be closed. Maybe it is a corner case, but what you describe is a corner case of the corner case. How many updates get actually withdrawn? 1%, 2%, 5%? > That means that the > script would need another rule that it _also_ closes bugs for the > release before regardless of MODIFIED/ON_QA. That's what it does already, no further rule needed. Regards, Christoph -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
