On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Christoph Wickert <christoph.wickert@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Despite of the question whether it's right or wrong it's a manual > process and we cannot rely it really happens. On the other hand changing > the script to not close any bugs which are ON_QA is easy. > > So what is so bad about ignoring bugs MODIFIED and/or ON_QA bugs? This is a corner case perhaps, but those bugs still need closing at some point. If an updates-testing package gets un-pushed or never gets sent to stable the bug will never be closed. That means that the script would need another rule that it _also_ closes bugs for the release before regardless of MODIFIED/ON_QA. -- There are 10 kinds of people in the world: Those who understand binary and those who don't... -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
