Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 19

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 11:19:10AM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> >> Additionally we will be mass patching config.guess and config.sub to
> >> support aarch64 in preperation for 64 bit arm support
> >
> > Ugh, this really shows how bundled autocrap sucks!

I have to agree with Kevin here ...

> > How are you going to determine the packages that need patching? Anything
> > running autoreconf, ./autogen.sh, KDE 3's "make -f admin/Makefile.common
> > cvs" or similar should not need patching (and in fact, IMHO, this should be
> > a requirement for autotools-based packages, exactly for this reason!).

... and also anything that doesn't have config.guess/config.sub, which
appears to be a lot of my packages for some reason.  IIRC these files
are only used/needed for cross-compiles aren't they?

> Nor should anything that's run their "make dist" tarball process with
> the latest tools.

Do you know which version of autoconf introduces aarch64 support?

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any
software inside the virtual machine.  Supports Linux and Windows.
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux