Re: Tor maintainership

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 14:12:44 +0100
Enrico Scholz <enrico.scholz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Jamie Nguyen <j@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > Thanks very much for adding me as a co-maintainer. I guess that you
> > probably don't have much time for updating the Tor package, so I'm
> > glad to be on board and will be taking a very active role in
> > maintaining the package so that you can spend time on other things.
> > I have some package cleanup tasks lined up and will be closing the
> > security bugs on our bugzilla very soon.
> 
> I will revert most of your changes.  please avoid to apply your
> personal style (e.g. whitespaces vs. tabs) on a package where you are
> a comaintainer for < 1 week.

While I understand this, I'd like to note that IMHO Fedora package
specs should not really have any 'personal style'. If they do, it means
they are harder for people to co-maintainer or provenpackages to step
in and fix things in case they need to. 
> 
> Although some of the changes might be useful, it is impossible for me
> to distinguish between them because they were all in an huge commit.

Well, the entire tor.spec without changelog is 245 lines. 
Couldn't you simply review the new version? 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux