Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Fedora Upgrade - using yum

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am 09.02.2013 15:52, schrieb drago01:
> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> oh even if people like i did some hundret dist-upgrades over the
>>> years it was us told that linux has to go the windows way:
>>>
>>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/OfflineSystemUpdates
>>
>> Yeah, this is a really insane "feature"!
>>
>> Let me assure you that this "feature" is only currently implemented in
>> gnome-packagekit. The command-line tools will probably NEVER implement this.
>> As for Apper, I can assure you that:
>> * this "feature" is not currently implemented in Apper,
>> * Apper's upstream author plans to support it in the future, but make it
>> optional, and
>> * KDE SIG has strong reservations about the usefulness and desirability of
>> this "feature" and it will likely end up disabled by default in Fedora if
>> implemented.
> 
> Yes become ignoring problems by pretending that they do not exist is
> the way to go ....

why preklink not banned which also touches probably running
binaries, but hey in this case it is OK because it was a
fedora feature years ago and there must be good

which problems?
where were they over decades?
who did introduce them recently?
why this bugs are not fixed?



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux