On 2013-02-05 21:46, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 02/05/2013 09:31 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
On 5 February 2013 20:10, Alec Leamas <leamas.alec@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I wouldn't say Fedora "follows blindly" but rather chooses an
upstream from
some alternatives (their ability to handle feedback from us beeing
one ot
the criterias).
Gnome has been the default, unless I'm misremebering since *before*
Fedora (RH8/9 or earlier). That's not incompatible with 'chooses an
upstream from some alternatives' but does suggest some inertia. Maybe
if Gnome really thinks distros might drop them they'd think harder
about introducing unwanted workflow changes every other release.
The actual problem is the current Gnome 3 being an entirely different
product than Gnome 2, which usability-wise has *nothing* in common
with Gnome2 and addresses a completely different target audience.
You ordered Gnome and have been served Pizza for a long time - now
you're being served Burgers :-)
Ralf
Well, from a nutrition perspective that's actually a big step forward.
Perhaps time to trust the chef? ;)
--alec
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
