Re: Proposed F19 Feature: systemd features

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/02/2013 07:03 AM, David Tardon wrote:
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 02:08:00AM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
When I meet a maintainer in the project that stated to me "I have to
talk to my manager first" before upgrading his "component" that
rings alarm bells to me, That gives me the feel that they are
maintaining their components as a part of their job not because they
want to scratch an itch and want to!
There is a third reason for maintaining a component: it is a dependency
for another component the packager maintains. This is applicable for
_all_ packagers, be they from Red Hat or the community. You either
conveniently omitted this reason to make an argument or never thought of
it, in which case I respectfully ask you to butt out of this thread
because you do not know what you are talking about.

Oh in my case it was an "primary" component no dependency that Red Hat maintainer could not update until he got approval but for the sake of your argument and concision let's lower my IQ to an rock ( which I do believe is 20 ) and say I dont have freaking flying idea what I'm talking about.

JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux