On Fri, 01 Feb 2013 09:38:19 +0100 Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 09:34 +0100, Robert Mayr wrote: > > > > > > 2013/2/1 Martin Sourada <martin.sourada@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Yes, defaults needs to be sensible and usable and for many > > people > > that's what they end up with. I'm not saying we should go > > and have AOO > > installed by default, but available in repos in a state that > > does not > > conflict with LO (and other office suites *in official > > repos*) ;-) Think > > about sysadmins, multi-user systems, ... Seeing a bug report > > saying "My > > LO Writer segfaults with this error while AOO is installed" > > isn't > > exactly helpful, but not having AOO isn't a solution. Hence > > I say OK to > > adding AOO, as long as it wont conflict with LO both as > > package and in > > runtime. > > > > Unlike pulseaudio (in the above linked thread), AOO is > > end-user GUI application, not a > > library/daemon/sound-server/whatever > > used to get the wanted sound to your headphones (that by > > design > > interferes with anything else trying to do the same) ;-) By > > adding AOO > > we're not breaking some third app, we might break LO and > > that's exactly > > what I consider critical not to do. Is it doable? Are there > > people > > willing and able to do that? If yes, sure, let them. > > > +1 Martin, that's the point. > > No that's completely not the point: > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-January/177803.html > Have you actually read what I wrote and what I was reacting to? Or have I written it so bad to make it seem in conflict with what you linked? Martin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
