Am 31.01.2013 17:43, schrieb Miloslav Trmač: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 5:37 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" > <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 01/31/2013 04:38 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 16:30:30 +0000 >>> "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> On 01/31/2013 04:30 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I don't see how a distribution default would make any sense. >>>> >>>> I guess that's as senseless to you as it is for me fesco decision of >>>> make mariadb to be preferred "default" is to me... >>> >>> That would be the default between MariaDB and Mysql. Which are (at >>> least for now mostly) compatible. So, if a package can use that >>> interface, we prefer them to use MariaDB. They can't use both at the >>> same time. >> >> Which fesco members is going to handle those changes? > > The MariaDB feature includes using provides/obsoletes on the "mysql" > names, so the transition should be automatic for most packages. with provides/obsoletes it would be IMPOSSIBLE to install mysql because ANY update to the mariadb package would replace it if this would be true the decision could only made by people never in their life built RPM SPEC-files with Provides/Obsoletes to replace installed packages _________________ Obsoletes: dovecot-mysql Provides: dovecot-mysql was used by me two days ago for my private dovecot-builds to no longer spilt out "dovecot-mysql" to a seperate apckage as the fedora one does
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
