On Wed, 2013-01-30 at 13:07 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Kay Sievers (kay@xxxxxxxx) said:
> > > Either you're intending for the lifetime of your OS to be shipping systemd
> > > updates that update the base data set,
> >
> > I don't intend to ship update packages in the context of systemd, we
> > can just update the data in the package like we add patches for other
> > fixes, in case we need an update. In the end PCI+USB IDs are just
> > pretty boring names for humans, not used in the system itself. What
> > makes them so special? It really sounds more like cosmetic care, than
> > a real technical need to update these more often than we will need to
> > update systemd anyway.
> >
> > > or you're intending to be shipping
> > > updated data sets in a separate package.
> >
> > We can just do that, but still could ship the default data in the main package.
>
> Would we be moving the other data to this model as well? I note that in
> F18 we ended up building systemd many many times just to update keymap
> conversions; it's wasteful in terms of builds and updates for users to be
> updating all of systemd just to add a new French keymap conversion, or
> to add a quirk just for some new laptop.
>
> The point is, we've done this in the past where we shipped the data with
> the tools, and we very quickly moved to shipping the data separate - it's
> cleaner, allows for just updating the data when necessary, and it forces
> people to keep their API & ABI for accessing it stable. :)
+1 million - another data point - ca-certificates package - it was much
cleaner to split it out of openssl.
--
Tomas Mraz
No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back.
Turkish proverb
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
