Miloslav Trmač (mitr@xxxxxxxx) said: > Some years ago all hardware data was moved out of various separate > packages into the "hwdata" package (even if it meant moving it out of > the original upstream source). The feature page doesn't even mention > the hwdata package. AFAICS this > > 1) Duplicates the data. > 1a) Will the two databases be kept in sync? How will that happen? It pulls from upstream at build time, from reading the code. > 2) Breaks the hwdata-vs-code separation that was created earlier. > What were the reasons of the separation, and why are they no longer > applicable now? It would be useful to be able to update this without updating systemd... is there any reason the perl generator for this can't be moved to hwdata itself and have *that* pull the upstream versions on build? Bill -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
