On Sex, 2013-01-25 at 12:56 -0800, Benjamin De Kosnik wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > With the more fine grained texlive packaging in F>18 where
> > > tex(latex) is provided by texlive-collection-latex I am finding
> > > that this is insufficient to build most documents. I see two
> > > options in these cases:
> > >
> > > 1) Add BuildRequires; texlive-collection-latexextra (nb.
> > > texlive-collection-latexrecommended isn't usually sufficient)
>
> Yes. Do this.
>
> I think, especially now as this dep tuning is going on, that the first
> step should be to bring out these "big gun" dependencies like:
>
> BuildRequires: texlive-collection-latexextra
>
> And get stuff working quickly.
>
> After the dust has settled with the transition and deps are even
> slightly modularized (from the old "latex"), then maybe at a future
> date the Deps can be investigated with more granularity, and
> the texlive-collections can be optimized.
For
/usr/share/doc/VirtualBox-4.2.6/UserManual.pdf
/usr/share/doc/VirtualBox-4.2.6/UserManual_fr_FR.pdf
I need add
%if 0%{?fedora} >= 18
BuildRequires: doxygen-latex
BuildRequires: texlive-collection-fontsrecommended
BuildRequires: texlive-ec
BuildRequires: texlive-ucs
BuildRequires: texlive-tabulary
BuildRequires: texlive-fancybox
%endif
texlive-collection-latexextra seems is not required
Regards,
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
