Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Fedora Upgrade - using yum

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 20:17 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 01/25/2013 07:39 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 2013/1/23 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >> On 01/23/2013 10:55 PM, drago01 wrote:
> >>> Supporting "none" is not an option.
> >>
> >> Really suddenly not an option.
> >>
> >> We did that for a long time why is that suddenly not an option so please
> >> enlighten me why that's not an option.
> >>
> >> Users are better of keeping /home on a separated partition and re-use it
> >> with an fresh install then those poor attempts to "support" upgrades one way
> >> or another which at this point in time we cant do since the bits for that
> >> aren't properly aligned to make that happen...
> > ? 8-)
> >
> > I really can't imagine it.
> >
> > I use Fedora as a server system for my daily developer work. I use
> > many services with different configurations. Actually updating it with
> > preupgrade/fedup is sometimes hard. Reinstalling whole system after
> > each release will be super painful.
> >
> 
> ?
> 
> Keep your server configuration in git and keep the relevant data on 
> separated partition then reinstall and checkout the config(s)

Why should I do all this when I can simply apt-get upgrade^W^Wyum
upgrade ?

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux