Re: Start of systemd timers after install/update of a package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:53:02AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> c) Or you could list them as "Wants=" dependency in your service unit's
>    [Service] section. That means that whenever your service unit is
>    started, your time unit is too. No need for preset file changes.
> I think c) is the best choice if it makes little sense to ever run the
> service without the timer unit. It makes things very robust. 
> 

In this case, if the service is disabled ("masked", in the new terminology),
would the timer still run, or does an inverse relationship need to also be
spelled-out?

-- 
Matthew Miller  ☁☁☁  Fedora Cloud Architect  ☁☁☁  <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux