Re: drop inheritance at f19 branch point?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 24.01.13 10:22, Richard W.M. Jones (rjones@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:38:00AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > And I disagree with this proposal.
> > 
> > It is mixed for me. Sometimes, I'd like to update in Rawhide,
> > especially if the freeze is taking long, while in other cases, I
> > need to do some bugfix in my packages which is found during testing
> > and needs to be applied to both branches. In this case, the
> > inheritance saves my work, while disabling the inheritance would
> > always duplicate my work. So the current state is ideal from my POV.
> 
> It doesn't duplicate your work, although it increases it a little.
> 
> If you keep the history of master and the fX branches consistent, and
> use 'fedpkg clone -B', then what you actually have to do is:
> 
>  - make the change in package/master
>  - fedpkg push && fedpkg build --nowait
>  - cd ../f18
>  - git pull ../master
>  - fedpkg push && fedpkg build --nowait

The "--nowait" doesn't really work. I do care if the build I did
finished successfully. With the lines above you kinda suggest that
people shouldn't care about build results... Just updating my spec file
and issuing a build request in "fire and forget" doesn't work.

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux