On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 09:54:01AM +0100, Dan Horák wrote: > Richard W.M. Jones píše v Út 22. 01. 2013 v 08:19 +0000: > > http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/952/4890952/root.log > > > > There's no conflict in dracut.spec. However mdadm.spec has the > > following lines: > > > > %if "%{fedora}" >= "18" > > Conflicts: dracut < 024-23 > > [...] > > %endif > > %if "%{fedora}" >= "17" > > Conflicts: dracut < 009-14 > > [...] > > %endif > > > > But as far as I can see from the root.log, dracut isn't installed in > > the buildroot. Maybe dracut is installed implicitly? > > the package set being resolved from libguestfs BuildRequires will bring > both dracut and mdadm in > > > The latest dracut in 'master' is dracut-023-13.git20120821.fc19. > > The latest in 'f18' is dracut-024-23.git20130118.fc18. Which gets > > installed and why? > > because dracut wasn't ever built from the master branch > > "koji latest-pkg f19 dracut" returns dracut-024-18.git20130102.fc18 > > > Why does mdadm conflict with dracut anyway? So ... the action to fix this is what? I tried adding a buildoverride of dracut-024-23.git20130118.fc18. Of course that didn't work (I now realize) because that only affects F18 builds. Or perhaps inheritance should pull it into Rawhide? In any case, it didn't work -- same conflict. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into KVM guests. http://libguestfs.org/virt-v2v -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
