Richard W.M. Jones píše v Út 22. 01. 2013 v 08:19 +0000: > http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/952/4890952/root.log > > There's no conflict in dracut.spec. However mdadm.spec has the > following lines: > > %if "%{fedora}" >= "18" > Conflicts: dracut < 024-23 > [...] > %endif > %if "%{fedora}" >= "17" > Conflicts: dracut < 009-14 > [...] > %endif > > But as far as I can see from the root.log, dracut isn't installed in > the buildroot. Maybe dracut is installed implicitly? the package set being resolved from libguestfs BuildRequires will bring both dracut and mdadm in > The latest dracut in 'master' is dracut-023-13.git20120821.fc19. > The latest in 'f18' is dracut-024-23.git20130118.fc18. Which gets > installed and why? because dracut wasn't ever built from the master branch "koji latest-pkg f19 dracut" returns dracut-024-18.git20130102.fc18 > Why does mdadm conflict with dracut anyway? Dan -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
