On 20 January 2013 11:13, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 06:53:27PM -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:.. and since that email was sent, the soname version of libnl3 has
> On 01/19/2013 04:58 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
> >Error: Package: 1:NetworkManager-0.9.7.0-11.git20121211.fc19.i686 (fedora)
> > Requires: libnl-genl-3.so.200
> > Removing: libnl3-3.2.14-1.fc18.i686 (@anaconda/18)
> > libnl-genl-3.so.200
> > Updated By: libnl3-3.2.19-1.fc19.i686 (fedora)
> > Not found
> >
> >
> >Anyone know whats going on ?
> >
> There was an email recently about libnl being updated and that
> breakage would likely happen. The rebuilds (and fixing) are
> probably not complete yet.
been bumped *again* (to 201!). Thus breaking all the packages again
which had been rebuilt, eg. libvirt, libguestfs.
Could the libnl maintainer ask upstream not to use such a daft soname
scheme? Or perhaps we should just override it with a sane one in
Fedora.
Thanks I will check things out and if fixed try again tomorrow.
Many thanks,
Aaron
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
