On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 06:53:27PM -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 01/19/2013 04:58 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: > >Error: Package: 1:NetworkManager-0.9.7.0-11.git20121211.fc19.i686 (fedora) > > Requires: libnl-genl-3.so.200 > > Removing: libnl3-3.2.14-1.fc18.i686 (@anaconda/18) > > libnl-genl-3.so.200 > > Updated By: libnl3-3.2.19-1.fc19.i686 (fedora) > > Not found > > > > > >Anyone know whats going on ? > > > There was an email recently about libnl being updated and that > breakage would likely happen. The rebuilds (and fixing) are > probably not complete yet. .. and since that email was sent, the soname version of libnl3 has been bumped *again* (to 201!). Thus breaking all the packages again which had been rebuilt, eg. libvirt, libguestfs. Could the libnl maintainer ask upstream not to use such a daft soname scheme? Or perhaps we should just override it with a sane one in Fedora. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
